🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an observance that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include events where African descendants are compensated to address Caucasian groups about hidden biases and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has evolved since that time, placing less emphasis on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the month is celebrated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it develops is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how important it is to rethink Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we witnessed the largest far-right rally in British history. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a legislator feels empowered to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are surging in the European continent as a whole.

In the United States, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the state. A drive to remove African American heritage and legacy from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the former president's first executive orders targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the observance illustrates how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content festivities of historical achievements, rather than addressing the realities of the contemporary world. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is required. Denise Miller, a prof at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a urge to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month altogether, believing they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an era that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an infrastructure that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not evade politics, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What use is simple recognition of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the street? Organizations who celebrate it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and awareness of subtle slights, but challenged by the risks that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and adaptive. It could be that an total re-identification is necessary – Black History is Now Month.