🔗 Share this article

Throughout the previous presidential campaign, Donald Trump courted voters with pledges to reduce prices immediately upon taking office. However, once his inauguration, there was precious little focus to affordability issues. This shifted following price-fatigued citizens delivered a rebuke at the polls. Shortly thereafter, his team launched a hastily assembled effort to tackle affordability. Regrettably, the drive is a hot mess—characterized by illogical claims, contradictions, magical thinking, scapegoating, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Out-of-Touch Claims and Supermarket Truth

Just two days after the election, Trump began his affordability drive with a disastrous statement: “Food prices are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” This comment from billionaire Trump—often associates with other ultra-rich individuals—revealed a lack of empathy for everyday citizens who struggle when visiting the grocery store. In effect, he dismissed their struggles as trivial, implying they were mistaken about actual costs.

This statement that everything was “way down” was highly misleading and dishonest. How could all costs be falling when his cherished tariffs were increasing prices? Recent data indicate banana prices increased nearly 7% over the past year, the price of beef went up almost 15%, and coffee prices surged by nearly 19%—in part due to punitive tariffs applied to Brazilian products. In the first three quarters, prices rose in five of the six food categories monitored by the Consumer Price Index, including animal proteins (up 4.5%), drinks (increasing nearly 3%), and fruits and vegetables (rising slightly).

Contradictions and Inaccuracies in Financial Claims

In spite of the evidence, the president continues to push his big lie about lower costs. Since election day, he has claimed there is “almost no price increases,” declared “costs have fallen significantly,” and argued “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under his predecessor.” Such remarks contradict the fact that prices overall have unarguably risen since Biden left office. Currently, price growth is running at a 3% annual rate, which is half again as much than the central bank’s target of 2 percent. Adding to the inaccuracies, he claimed that fuel costs had fallen to nearly $2 a gallon, even though official data indicate they are $3.19.

Confronted by reality and declining opinion polls, advisers apparently cautioned that his “costs are falling” message made him sound dangerously out of touch from ordinary people. Many voters are angry about prices continuing to climb after assurances of reductions. In response, advisers suggested one quick fix: reduce certain import taxes. The logical move clashed with the president’s unrealistic claim that additional taxes would not increase costs for US consumers.

Suggested Fixes and Their Possible Impact

With some tariffs reduced on coffee, beef, tomatoes, and bananas, the administration will likely claim that he has cut prices once these products begin to fall in price. That would be like an arsonist taking credit for extinguishing a blaze that he had started. On another occasion, when addressing McDonald’s executives, Trump stated that “this is the peak period of America” and assured the audience that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” These comments come naturally for a wealthy individual to make, but seem insincere to millions of Americans facing hardships—especially when many face losing food stamps or rising insurance costs.

According to a survey from October, 74% of Americans believe the state of the economy are mediocre or bad, while only 26% consider them good or excellent. A separate survey found that a majority of citizens say Trump’s policies have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Financial Reality and Suggested Steps

Scott Bessent, the president’s top economic official, recently contradicted claims of a prosperous era. He noted that instead of thriving, certain sectors of the US economy “are in recession.” The manufacturing sector—a priority for the administration—seems to have shrunk for multiple consecutive months and lost approximately tens of thousands of positions since January. Pointing to these challenges, Bessent called on the central bank to cut interest rates—an action that could help affordability.

In response to widespread concern about living costs, the president proposed a cash handout of “a dividend of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “the wealthy.” To numerous households in need, this sounds like a financial lifeline, but the prospects are dim that lawmakers—already alarmed about large shortfalls—will enact the proposal. The scheme would likely increase federal spending, increase interest rates, and possibly drive prices higher by putting more money into consumers’ pockets.

A further proposed solution for affordability involved creating half-century home loans, with the notion that this would reduce monthly mortgage payments. However, reality is that 50-year mortgages have minimal impact to reduce installments—frequently cutting them by a small amount per month. The downside is that these loans could more than double the overall cost borrowers pay and hinder building home value.

Faulting the Previous Administration and Financial Prospects

In their affordability campaign, Trump and his team have once more blamed the previous president for economic problems, such as rising prices. Officials claimed they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “addressing Biden’s inflation.” These are absurd and inaccurate allegations. Actually, the former president handed over a robust economic situation, with inflation way down, solid expansion, and unemployment low. However, the current administration’s actions—especially import taxes—have resulted in an economic mess, pushing up prices and reducing economic output.

Per Mark Zandi, lead analyst at Moody’s Analytics, numerous regions are already in recession, with their economies damaged by Trump’s tariffs. He worries that if key regions such as California and New York enter a downturn, the nation could face a widespread recession. In downturns, consumers typically have reduced funds to spend, and price increases usually declines. Unfortunately, with the highly-touted cost initiative probably ineffective to control costs, his most effective “tool” for improving living standards might prove to be pushing the nation into recession—something that struggling Americans really can’t afford.